Legal Opinion

Storgard v. France & Canada S. S. Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 14, 1920No. 101PublishedCited by 42 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Konrad S'torgard against the France & Canada Steamship Corporation. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff seeks to recover indemnity for injuries sustained by him when an able seaman on the five-masted schooner Singleton Palmer on a voyage from St. Nazaire, France, to Newport News. Several fingers of his left hand were jammed between a ring on a bolt and the lips of the band around the mast, which were connected together by the bolt. The charge of negligence was that the owner permitted the bolt to become worn anu defective, so that the vessel was unseaw'orthy as to him. It will not be necessary to go into particulars, because the jury found a verdict for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. John A. Roebling's Sons Co. of New York v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  3. The Edith GoddenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
  4. The ColusaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  5. FiskeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. George W. Dixon, Libelant-Appellee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. Southport Transit Company v. Avondale Marine Ways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API