Fiske
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Admiralty. Suit by seaman to recover for personal injuries.
1Opinion of the Court
DODGE, District Judge.
The libel in this case claims damages for personal injuries received by the libelant while serving as a seaman on-board the schooner. Its language is for the most part that properly belonging to a libel in rem against the schooner, and the process issued upon it was the warrant and monition usual in such a suit. There was no arrest of the vessel, but due service of the warrant and monition upon her, and also upon her master and her owners, has been acknowledged by counsel representing them all. In the answer which has been filed by the owners they claim the vessel. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The CorsairSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- The Edith GoddenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
- The S. L. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902
- McCarron v. Dominion Atlantic Ry. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Bouker No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- George W. Dixon, Libelant-Appellee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Veronica Cox, Administratrix of the Estate of William D. Cox, in No. 74-1609 v. Dravo Corporation, in No. 74-1576Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.