Boehmer v. Big Rock Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los-Angeles County granting a new trial. Lucien Shaw,. Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action is prosecuted by the plaintiff to quiet title to certain water rights alleged to be appurtenant to certain of his lands as riparian owner. The cause was heard upon an agreed statement of facts and the deposition of one witness. Written findings were filed and judgment entered. The defendants moved for a new trial, and upon the hearing thereof the following minute order was made: “ Defendants move the court for new trial herein on the grounds stated in the notice of motion on file. Motion is argued and thereupon granted on the grounds stated, and also on the court’s own…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Rogers v. SchulenburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Watkins Land Co. v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Tormey v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Jones v. ConnOregon Supreme Court · 1901
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.