Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Babcock

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1892No. 14505PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This is an action upon a promissory note made by one Story, payable to the order of plaintiff ninety days after date, and containing the following *101provision: “ Should suit be commenced, or an attorney employed to enforce the payment of this note, I agree to pay an additional sum of five per cent on principal and accrued interest as attorney’s fees in such suit.” The note was executed at the instance and request of the defendant to take up another note on which he was liable; and before its delivery he indorsed it by writing his name upon the back thereof, and then delivered it to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. SeamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Riggs v. WaldoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Jones v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Fessenden v. SummersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Brady v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  3. Pierce v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Mason v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Rogers v. SchulenburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API