Legal Opinion
Viaggio v. Field
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 10, 1959No. Civ. A. 11499PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The matter presently before the court is whether this damage suit arising from an automobile collision in Maryland, should be transferred to the District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania under title 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1404 (a) or 1406(a), on plaintiff’s motion to transfer, or whether the suit should be dismissed on the motion of the defendant because improperly filed in this court, as not within the proper venue under title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(a) in that this district is not the residence of either the plaintiff, a citizen of Florida, or the defendant, a citizen of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Headrick v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Greve v. Gibraltar Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1949
- Wilt v. SmackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bacik v. PeekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
- Schreiber v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
- Kaiser v. Mayo ClinicDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1966
- Thornton v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.