Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Abraham
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 9, 2003No. CIV.A.1:01CV00548(RMC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, who are utilitiés and manufacturers in the energy industry, have filed suit to require the United States Department of Energy and two senior department officials (cohectively, “DOE”) to complete the distribution of crude oil overcharge refunds to more than 56,000 end users of oil products found by the DOE to be entitled to such restitution. 1 They complain that (1) the DOE’s Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) has improperly limited refunds for private-party claimants to no more than 20% of the recovered overcharges designated for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Tao v. FreehCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Con Edison Co NY Inc v. Bodman, SamuelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. BodmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Kalodner v. BodmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. BodmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007