Legal Opinion
Con Edison Co NY Inc v. Bodman, Samuel
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 9, 2006No. 05-5302PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is the latest iteration in a series of related lawsuits that involve the question whether States and federal agencies can obtain refunds under the 1986 Stripper Well settlement. 1 Consolidated Edison et al. (“the Claimants”) appeal the dismissal of their complaint against the Department of Energy (“DOE”) and its Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) on the ground that the district court erred in holding that the doctrine of issue preclusion barred the suit. In light of the interpretation by the United…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Yamaha Corporation of America v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Agudas Chasidei Chabad of United States v. FederationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- McCain v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Nattah v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.