Legal Opinion
Kalodner v. Bodman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 18, 2006No. Civil Action No. 06-818 (RMC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Philip P. Kalodner, Esq., persuaded this Court to order the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) to distribute certain funds to his clients and others. See Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Abraham, 271 F.Supp.2d 104 (D.D.C.2003) (“ConEd IV”), aff'd, 87 Fed.Appx. 751 (Fed.Cir.2004). Mr. Kalodner subsequently brought a suit to force DOE to increase the amount of the distribution, which DOE eventually did of its own volition. See Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Abraham, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27190, No. 03-1991 (D.D.C. June 30, 2004) {“ConEd V”), aff'd…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- C. ROBERT SUESS v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. BodmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Garcia v. Praxair Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Suess v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011