Legal Opinion

Hartenstein v. FLA. DEPT. OF LABOR, ETC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 24, 1980No. 80-53PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

391 So.2d 386 (1980)

Donald W. HARTENSTEIN, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 80-53.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 24, 1980.

Alvaro Ruiz, Tampa, for appellant.

James R. Parks and A. Robert Whaley, Tallahassee, for appellee.

DANAHY, Judge.

In a case of first impression in Florida, we review a determination that appellant was self-employed and, therefore, not unemployed within the meaning of Florida's unemployment compensation law. An appeals referee reached that conclusion and denied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bolles v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Johnson v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Siddiqi v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Bartel v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Cumming v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeLisi v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Grover v. Brumell Investigations, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Momsen v. State, Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Goldstein v. Lulu'sDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API