Legal Opinion
Homan v. MacKey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 28, 1928No. Appeal, 330PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
The plaintiff, Theodore Homan, was an employee of the City of Philadelphia for approximately twenty-one years, ending in 1916, when he became and still is an officer of the state Superior Court. By Act of May 20, 1915, P. L. 566, as amended by Act of July 5,1917, P. L. 689, employees of cities of the first class, having served for twenty years and being sixty years of age, are entitled on withdrawal from such service to receive from the city a life pension under conditions stated therein. The acts created a pension board consisting of the mayor and other…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dunlap v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Commonwealth ex rel. Snyder v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- Commonwealth ex rel. Hamilton v. Select & Common CouncilsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Commonwealth ex rel. Century Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Board Trustees Firemen's Pension Fund v. McCroryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- McBride v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Tanenbaum v. D'AscenzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Chilli v. McKeesport School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Goodman Et Ux. v. MeadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.