Legal Opinion

Morganstern Electric Co. v. Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1937No. Appeal, 67PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

By an ordinance of council approved by the burgess on August 7, 1933, the Borough of Coraopolis, defendant in the present action, enacted, “That a municipal overhead electric street lighting system be constructed, erected and operated on the streets, lanes, roads, highways and alleys of the Borough of Coraopolis,” and “That the proper officers of the Borough be and they are hereby authorized and directed to advertise for and procure bids for said construction and erection. . . . ” On October 2, plaintiff submitted a bid in writing to construct the lighting system…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Stanley Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Carpenter v. Yeadon BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Schenck v. BurgessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Hepburn v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Luzerne Township v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Emerman v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Chilli v. McKeesport School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. F. W. Wise Co. v. Beech Creek RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Warner Bros. Theatres, Inc. v. ProffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API