Legal Opinion

Lazarus v. Goodman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1963No. Appeal, 139PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is an action of assumpsit for breach of a written contract of employment between a partnership, known as Harris and Hirsch Agency, and the plaintiff, Norman Lazarus.

The defendants, Harris and Hirsch, admittedly executed the contract, and were partners in the agency. However, they denied any breach of the contract. The defendant, Goodman, denied being a partner, or having any connection with the company.

At trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against all three defendants. Motions for a new trial and judgment notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Helmig v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Commonwealth v. SchuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Consolidated Tile & Slate Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Kosco v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Morgan v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Baker v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Volkman v. DP ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. BOWIE v. SHELTONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Pavlich v. Ambrosia Coal & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API