Legal Opinion

Brin v. S.E.W. Investors

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2006No. 02-CV-649PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Senior Judge:

Appellant Marla Brin filed a complaint against S.E.W. Investors and five other appellees 1 seeking damages for injuries allegedly incurred as a result of the defective air quality in the building in which she worked. The trial court granted judgment in favor of appellees on the ground that the law suit was barred by the statute of limitations. We hold, contrary to the view of the trial court, that under the discovery rule, the statute of limitations did not begin to run in this case until Brin received, or with the exercise of due diligence could have received, expert…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Oparaugo v. WattsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Colbert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Wilson v. El-DaiefSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Wright v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Daniel Logan v. LaSalle Bank National AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. C & E SERVICES, INC. v. Ashland, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. Herron v. AnigboIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API