Legal Opinion

Herron v. Anigbo

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2008No. 45S03-0811-CV-594PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 45A03-0608-CV-378.

BOEHM, Justice.

The Indiana Medical Malpractice Act provides for an occurrence-based statute of limitations, i.e., a medical malpractice claim must be filed within two years after the act or omission alleged to constitute malpractice. We have held that the statute is constitutional on its face but may violate the Indiana Constitution if applied to a plaintiff who despite exercise of reasonable diligence does not learn of the injury or malpractice before the period expires. We elaborate what exercise of reasonable…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dan Richards v. Michael MitcheffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Mary Alice Manley, and Gary Manley v. Ryan J. Sherer, M.D., and Sherer Family Medicine, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Overton v. GrilloIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Tru-Cal, Inc. v. Conrad Kacsik Instrument Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Theresa Biedron v. Anonymous Physician 1Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API