Legal Opinion

Overlock v. Ruedemann

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 8, 1960PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.

This reservation from the Superior Court poses the question whether an unemancipated minor child can be held to respond in damages for negligence which proximately caused injury to one sister and death to another, both being unemancipated minors also. The named plaintiff sues as administrator of the estate of Jayne Ruedemann, the deceased unemancipated minor sister of the defendant. In a second count, Carol Ruedemann, another unemancipated minor sister, sues through her father to recover for personal injuries.

A summary of the facts stipulated is as follows: On October 12, 1958, in the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Kaczorowski v. KalkosinskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Briere v. BriereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  2. Silesky Ex Rel. Silesky v. KelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Begley v. Kohl & Madden Printing Ink Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Gorke v. Le ClercConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
  5. Wagner v. ShanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API