Legal Opinion
United States v. Eramdjian
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 7, 1957No. Cr. 26641, 26644, 26721, 26776PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
These are cases of first impression and concern Sec. 1407, Title 18, U.S.C.A. enacted July 18, 1956, c. 629, Title II, Sec. 201, 70 Stat. 574. The cases raise questions concerning the interpretation and constitutionality of the statute. 1
The statute reads,
“§ 1407. Border crossings — nar cotic addicts and violators
“(a) In order further to give effect to the obligations of the United States pursuant to the Hague convention of 1912, proclaimed as a treaty on March 3, 1915 (38 Stat. 1912), and the limitation convention of 1931, proclaimed as a treaty on July 10,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- The People v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Moises Rivas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- People v. Stark and PeacockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Theodulo Nava Reyes v. United States of America, Federico Perez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Howard C. Good v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.