Legal Opinion
Yenkichi Ito v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1933No. 7000PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
64 F.2d 73 (1933)
YENKICHI ITO
v.
UNITED STATES.
SAME
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 7000.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 27, 1933.
William H. Wylie and H. P. L. Beck, both of San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Samuel W. McNabb, U. S. Atty., and Harry Graham Balter, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for the United States.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Two indictments were returned against appellant. The indictment in case No. 2054-H charged appellant with the substantive offense of bringing into and attempting to bring into the United States…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- People v. WerblowNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Stassi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Delgado-Garcia, JoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Aston Winter, Howard Charles Towne, Stanton Davis and William Michael ParksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Hudspeth v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. De La Cruz SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.