Bernat v. Allphin
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
1 1 Petitioners challenge the constitutionality of Utah's two-tier justice court system, arguing that this system violates the prohibition against double jeopardy and denies defendants due process and equal protection under the law. They assert that, in light of these alleged violations, the court of appeals abused its discretion when it refused to issue writs of mandamus directing various district courts to dismiss the charges against Petitioners. We reject Petitioners' constitutional challenges and affirm the court of appeals.
BACKGROUND
12 Petitioners Sean Bernat, Lesa…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CruzUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RodriguesUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- West Jordan City v. GoodmanUtah Supreme Court · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.