Legal Opinion

City of Hamilton v. Fairfield Township

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1996No. Nos. CA95-05-085, CA95-05-088 and CA95-09-148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Powell, Judge.

This appeal concerns whether R.C. 709.50 violates several provisions of the Ohio Constitution. The General Assembly enacted R.C. 709.50 on May 26, 1994 as Am.Sub.S.B. No. 264. The statute became effective on September 29, 1994 and provides as follows:

“(A) Notwithstanding any other section of the Revised Code, when a township contains at least ninety per cent of the geographic area of a municipal corporation, either that township or the municipal corporation may remove that part of that township that is located within the municipal corporation from that township if all of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. May v. Tandy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sorrell v. ThevenirOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Board of Education v. WalterOhio Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. CurlOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. CurlOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Ohio Redistricting Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Monarch Construction Co. v. Ohio School Facilities Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2002
  5. Sunderland v. Liberty Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API