Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.
The issue tendered for our decision is whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing the trial court to permit the defendant-petitioner to amend its answer. The purpose of the proposed amendment is to assert a counterclaim for contribution against the plaintiff in an action consolidated for purposes of trial with another cause in which the plaintiff stands as an alleged joint tortfeasor and which arose out of the same occurrence.
Because a writ of mandamus may not issue where an adequate remedy at law exists, we initially address the consequences of the trial…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Laubach v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Gay v. AkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Stephens v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- McDaneld v. Lynn Hickey Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. v. TyreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Fox v. Security NationalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Valley View Angus Ranch, Inc. v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Bankers Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.