Legal Opinion

Van Keulen v. Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 2008No. B198388PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

When a California plaintiff brings an action against a foreign defendant in a California court, the trial court does not possess the authority to dismiss the action on the basis of forum non conveniens. Instead, if the court determines California to be an inconvenient forum, the California court must stay the California action, in order to retain the ability to protect the California resident pending the resolution of the action in the foreign court. In this case, however, after the California court stayed the action on the basis of forum non conveniens, the California…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Archibald v. Cinerama HotelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ladd v. Dart Equipment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Williams v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Terzian v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Auffret v. Capitales Tours, S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Corrinet v. Bardy, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Corrinet v. BardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Dounel v. Duel CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API