Legal Opinion

Corrinet v. Bardy

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 9, 2019No. A153241Published

1Opinion of the CourtTucher, J.

*813Mark Corrinet (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment dismissing his lawsuit for failure to prosecute. ( Code Civ. Proc., §§ 583.410 - 583.430.)1 Plaintiff contends this discretionary dismissal was error when, among other things, a trial date had been set pursuant to the parties' stipulation and the case was ready for trial. We reverse the judgment.

I. THE DISCRETIONARY DISMISSAL STATUTE

Section 583.410, subdivision (a) provides that a "court may in its discretion dismiss an action for delay in prosecution ... if to do so appears to the court appropriate under the circumstances of the case." This…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Landry v. Berryessa Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Farrar v. McCormickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API