Plonski v. Halloran
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtAspell, J.
The defendant, a former Connecticut resident now living in California, has moved to dismiss this action on the ground of insufficient service of process. Service was allegedly made on the defendant by a deputy sheriff who left a copy of the writ, summons and complaint in the defendant’s Connecticut hotel room while the defendant was in Connecticut temporarily on business. The issue presented is whether a hotel room where the defendant was staying at the time service was made is a usual place of abode as that term is used in General Statutes § 52-57.
Section 52-57 provides in relevant part:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Grant v. DalliberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
- Jenkins v. Bishop Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & KurianskyConnecticut Superior Court · 1984
- United Bank of Loves Park v. DohmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Crotteau v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.