Legal Opinion

Plonski v. Halloran

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 22, 1980No. File 243437PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAspell, J.

The defendant, a former Connecticut resident now living in California, has moved to dismiss this action on the ground of insufficient service of process. Service was allegedly made on the defendant by a deputy sheriff who left a copy of the writ, summons and complaint in the defendant’s Connecticut hotel room while the defendant was in Connecticut temporarily on business. The issue presented is whether a hotel room where the defendant was staying at the time service was made is a usual place of abode as that term is used in General Statutes § 52-57.

Section 52-57 provides in relevant part:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  2. Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Grant v. DalliberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
  5. Jenkins v. Bishop Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & KurianskyConnecticut Superior Court · 1984
  4. United Bank of Loves Park v. DohmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Crotteau v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API