Legal Opinion
Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 11, 1984No. File 210139PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacobson, J.
The defendant law firm of Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky represented the plaintiff in a marital dissolution action brought by her hus band. The plaintiff brings this action against the firm and two of its members individually based on a theory of legal malpractice concerning that representation. Service was made upon the defendants by leaving process with the secretary of the firm at the firm's business address.
The defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Practice Book § 142 for insufficiency of service of process. The motion alleges that the court lacks jurisdiction over the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- American Laundry MacHinery, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Hyde v. RichardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Plonski v. HalloranConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- Town of East Lyme v. HuntingtonConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bankers Trust Company of California v. Mazur, No. 315874 (Oct. 8, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Cashman v. Cashman, No. 27 64 22 (Nov. 4, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Co-Operative Cit. Mon. v. Pub. Util. Cont., No. Cv94 0364861 (Jun. 21, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Connelly v. Cosgrove, No. Cv 98-057 80 00 (Apr. 27, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Evans v. Evans, No. 6631 (Nov. 12, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.