Nazarro v. Hudson Manhattan Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
The single question argued and requiring decision is whether, as appellant claims, the trial judge erred in refusing to grant its motion to direct a verdict in its favor on the ground that there was no proof of any negligence on ■its part which was the proximate cause of the plaintiffs’ injuries.
The proofs which give rise to the stated question disclose that plaintiff Elora Hazarro resides in Jersey City, New Jersey, and works in New York-City, New York. She was a regular commuter between the two points. On January 19th, 1938, about…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Hansen v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Seckler v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Thurber v. Skouras Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Lastowski v. LawnickiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meyonberg v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Bessie C. Lampka v. Wilson Line of Washington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Werthman v. Catholic Order of ForestersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Com. v. Alexander, KSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Meyonberg v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.