Bessie C. Lampka v. Wilson Line of Washington, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The District Court directed a verdict for the defendant, appellee here, on the basis of appellant’s opening statement to the jury. Appellant contends first that the complaint states a claim on which relief could be granted and second that the opening statement asserts appellee’s negligence in failing to perform its duty to take adequate precaution against the foreseeable hazards incident to the simultaneous disembarkation of 100 to 150 passengers through a passageway which narrows to approximately 12 feet at the exit.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide various means for summary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Schwartzman v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Dilley v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Greene v. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Margaret T. Calbreath, Individually and as Administratrix of James B. Calbreath, Deceased v. Capital Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trollope v. KoernerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- James C. Tullis v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Jerome S. Murray v. Irving S. LichtmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Keranen v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- John R. Pearson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.