New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kalisch, J.
Stripped of all technical matters which do not appear to affect materially the merits of the case, the main legal questions raised by the appellant concern the application of the ordinary legal rules pertaining to cases of negligence of the kind, as here. The contention of appellant’s counsel, is, that the trial judge erred, in failing to properly apply these legal rules, in denjdng appellant’s motion for a nonsuit, and for a direction of a verdict in its favor and in his charge to the jury.
The respondent, plaintiff in the court below,…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. State of RussiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- MACCIA EX REL. MACCIA v. TynesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Meyonberg v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Lehigh Valley R. v. John Lysaght, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.