Legal Opinion
McCurley v. City of El Reno
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 10, 1929No. 18992PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, C.
The parties will be referred to as they appeared below. Plaintiff’s petition alleged that he had been granted a permit to build a filling station on right of way of street railway company of El Reno; that when he began to build, the city revoked the permit and caused plaintiff’s arrest for violation of the zoning ordinance of said city and caused his employees to cease work; that said zoning ordinance No. 1061 was not passed as required by chapter 178, •Sess. L. 1923, and was void; that it was unreasonable and violated the state and federal Constitutions. Plaintiff demanded…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Bd. of Sup'rs of Fairfax Cty. v. HorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.