Legal Opinion
Sugar v. North Baltimore Methodist Protestant Church
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 5, 1933No. [Nos. 8, 9, January Term, 1933.]PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Parke, ,J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
George W. Hennick was the owner of a lot of land in Baltimore City. The lot was improved by a residence, and the property was known as No. 1521 Mt. Royal Avenue. Sarah Sugar desired to convert the dwelling into a confectionery and delicatessen store, and, at the instance of the owner, applied in November, 1981, for a permit to make this transformation, but permission was refused because the premises were located in a residential use district from which delicatessen stores are excluded by the terms of Ordinance No. 1247 of Baltimore City, approved…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Bradley v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Anderson v. JesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Cassel v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Montgomery County v. Merlands Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY. v. Loyola CollegeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.