Legal Opinion
Forest Properties, Inc.(now Known as Rck Properties, Inc.) v. United States, and Big Bear Municipal Water District
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 19, 1999No. 97-5145PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal challenges the Court of Federal Claims’ decision that the United States did not take the appellant’s real property when it denied the appellant a permit to dredge and fill certain underwater lake-bottom property. We agree that there was no taking and therefore affirm the judgment dismissing this suit for just compensation.
I
This case grows out of the planned residential development of two segments of property. The first segment is a 53 acre tract of upland contiguous to Big Bear Lake (the Lake) in Southern California. The second is 9.4 acres of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- A & D Auto Sales, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Norman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- District Intown Properties Ltd. Partnership v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Rith Energy, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.