Legal Opinion

Crispi v. Emmott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 14, 1960No. 13518PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODRUFF, Justice.

Appellee, A. V. Emmott, filed suit January 10, 1959 against J. G. Crispi, as Administrator of the Estate of Lloyd R. Day, to establish a claim for $937.75 alleged to be due on a $1,000 promissory note executed by Lloyd R. Day on December 29, 1953 payable to appellee on or before April 1, 1954. Appellee alleged extensions of the note, as hereafter stated. In a trial to the court without a jury, judgment was rendered in Emmott’s behalf for $937.75 against Crispi as administrator and ordering that it be certified to the Clerk of the Probate Court. From this judgment the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Tsesmelis v. Sinton State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. McNeill v. SimpsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Maxwell v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Ry. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Atkinson Gas Co. v. Albrecht, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  2. Barstow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Commerce, Crowdus & Canton, Ltd. v. DKS Construction Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  4. AB Lewis Company v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. City of Fort Worth v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API