City of Fort Worth v. Holland
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARRIS, Justice.
The City of Fort Worth appeals a judgment, based upon jury verdict, awarding the appellee property damages sustained as a result of a broken water main. In this case, the appellee relied upon the res ipsa loquitur doctrine to prove the City’s negligence.
We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this case for new trial because the evidence was insufficient to establish that the City was negligent in failing to properly maintain its water main.
Before addressing the City’s points of error complaining that there is alternatively no evidence or insufficient…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Jones v. Tarrant Utility Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atkinson Gas Co. v. Albrecht, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- In the Interest of A.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Commerce, Crowdus & Canton, Ltd. v. DKS Construction Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Leaird's, Inc. v. Wrangler, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- State v. MoraleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.