Legal Opinion

In re Sigman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 18, 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Patterson

In an ethics proceeding conducted by the Pennsylvania Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), respondent Scott P. Sigman admitted to violating several Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct. Respondent’s disciplinary proceedings arose from his misappropriation of referral and legal fees that should have been paid, in whole or in part, to the law firm that employed him, his misuse of other resources belonging to his employer, and his false testimony regarding insurance proceeds issued in a real estate matter. With respondent’s consent, and based on his admissions of wrongdoing, the Supreme…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Matter of SiegelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Matter of SpinaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the MATTER OF, Joseph Peter BARRETT, an Attorney at Law.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  2. In the Matter of Dionne Larrel Wade (085931)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API