Philbrick v. Weinberger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff, Helen Wynne Philbrick, from an adverse judgment after a trial by jury, which absolved defendants, licensed pharmacists, from all liability for injuries allegedly caused to plaintiff’s eye by reason of their negligence in filling a prescription calling for Neo Deeadron Ophthalmic Ointment, a medication intended for use in the eye.
Except for the issue of causation, the facts are not in dispute, and may be summarized as follows: On March 10, 1961, some foreign substance blew into plaintiff’s right eye which she was unable to remove. Due to the fact that plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Palmer v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ragusano v. Civic Center Hospital FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kraus v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Orr v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Waller v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Donahue v. United Artists Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982