Legal Opinion

State v. Forney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1984No. 25A83PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Defendant contends that the evidence at trial was insufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of any of the offenses charged. At the close of the State’s evidence, the defendant moved to dismiss the charges against him. His motion was denied. We must therefore consider whether there is substantial evidence (1) of each essential element of the offense chárged, or of a lesser included offense, and (2) of defendant’s being the perpetrator of such offense. The test of whether the evidence is sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss is whether a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. LowerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. LedfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API