Legal Opinion

Suess v. Heale

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1966No. 38440PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnett, J. †

Plaintiffs appeal from a default judgment entered in their favor by which they were denied attorney’s fees.

Plaintiffs Robert and Helen Suess and Glen and Fay Scott, as sellers, and defendant Robert Heale, as purchaser, entered into a real-estate contract for the sale of certain property located in King County, upon which is located an apartment house. It recited a purchase price of $45,000; $4,000 down, the balance to be paid at the rate of at least $340 per month.

The following provisions of the contract are pertinent:

Time is of the essence of this contract. In case the purchaser…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motor Contract Co. v. Van Der VolgenWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Holland v. BradleyOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Stusser v. GottsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Geyen v. Time Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Reeker v. RemourWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Turner v. WexlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Brower Co. v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Sofie v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Emrich v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API