Brill v. Lynn
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
¡Opinion op the Court by
Commissioner Sandidge—
Affirming.
On September 20, 1922', appellees, Arizona Lynn and ber husband, Carl Lynn, conveyed to appellant, Otto Brill, three tracts of land. For part of the purchase price Brill gave them purchase money lien notes to the amount of, $4,000.00. The notes were not paid at maturity and appellees sued to enforce their collection under the lien. Appellees were and are nonresidents of the state of Kentucky. Making his answer a counterclaim, Brill defended claiming that the title of one of the tracts of land was defective and suing for the breach of.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vaughan v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Wagner V. Wallowa CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Kimbrell v. ParmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reichard v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Atkins v. GillespieTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Mareck v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- In Re Application of Mareck to Register TitleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Fayette County v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.