Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Gillespie

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

By deed executed May 8, 1834, James King conveyed a certain lot of real estate in Knox Connty to trustees named therein, the predecessors in trust of the complainants, C. B. Atkin et al. The habendum clause of this deed is as follows:

“To have and to hold the above described lot or parcel of land, situate, lying and being as aforesaid, to he held by them, the aforesaid Trustees and their successors in office, forever in trust, that they shall erect and build thereon a house of worship for the use of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States of America according to the rules and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. YarbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Board of Education v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Brill v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Copenhaver v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Richards v. RoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API