Legal Opinion
Atkins v. Gillespie
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart
By deed executed May 8, 1834, James King conveyed a certain lot of real estate in Knox Connty to trustees named therein, the predecessors in trust of the complainants, C. B. Atkin et al. The habendum clause of this deed is as follows:
“To have and to hold the above described lot or parcel of land, situate, lying and being as aforesaid, to he held by them, the aforesaid Trustees and their successors in office, forever in trust, that they shall erect and build thereon a house of worship for the use of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States of America according to the rules and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yarbrough v. YarbroughTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Board of Education v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Brill v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
3Cited by17 opinions
- Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Copenhaver v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Richards v. RoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- State v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.