Legal Opinion

Kimbrell v. Parmer

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 18, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

On August 17, 1896, Andrew B. Hampton and wife conveyed to appellant and plaintiff below, Dora B. Kimbrell, who was.then Dora B. Foreman, a tract of land in Montgomery county containing slightly more than 106 acres. In the caption of the deed plaintiff is mentioned as “party of the second part” and in the granting clause the conveyance is to her, “her heirs and assigns,” as is also true in the habendum; but immediately following the description there is a limitation clause in these words: “This deed is made upon the following conditions that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Sale v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  3. Dinger v. LuckenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Murphy v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Walton v. BohannonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lightfoot v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Brill v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  3. Mitchell v. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Stanley v. SloneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Nunn v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API