Legal Opinion

American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. City of Bellingham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 6, 2011No. 67553-2-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 Initiative No. 2011-01 exceeds the lawful scope of local initiative power; it is not a valid ballot measure. The lawsuit did not violate RCW 4.24.525, the anti-SLAPP (“Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation”) statute. We reverse the trial court on these issues but deny the request for an injunction.

FACTS

¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. On December 6, 2010, the Bellingham City Council enacted Ordinance No. 2010-12-064, which established a system of automated traffic safety cameras to enforce certain traffic infractions. Bellingham Municipal Code (BMC) 11.16.020. RCW…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Coppernoll v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Longview v. WallinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Mukilteo Citizens v. City of MukilteoWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Spratt v. ToftCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Eyman v. McGeheeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Brett Bass, Respondents/cross-app. v. City Of Edmonds, Apps./cross-resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API