Legal Opinion

Spratt v. Toft

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 21, 2014No. 70505-9-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grosse, J.*

¶1 To succeed on a special motion to strike under Washington’s anti-SLAPP statute,* 1 the moving party must make an initial prima facie showing that the claimant’s suit arises from an act in furtherance of the right of petition or free speech in connection with a matter of public concern. Campaigning and speech connected to a political campaign and candidate clearly involve free speech and clearly are matters of public concern. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s denial of Bradley Toft’s motion to dismiss, and we remand for consideration of whether Kelly Spratt establishes by…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Johnson v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Baseball Club v. SDL Baseball Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. In Re Dependency Of : A.m-s., Dob: 12/17/08, Sergio Michel-garcia, Pet v. State Of Wa, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Davis v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API