Legal Opinion

Applied Industrial Materials Corp. v. Melton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 2, 1994No. 32415-2-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

— In February 1992, Applied Industrial Materials Corporation (AIMCOR) filed an action against Melton, Smith and Pacific Rim Olivine, Inc. (Pacific Rim), to quiet title in 34 mining claims. AIMCOR and its predecessors originally "located” 1 all of these claims. In early 1989, Pacific Rim attempted to "relocate” 2 the claims.

The trial court originally granted AIMCOR’s motion for summary judgment, but on reconsideration it ruled as a matter of law that RCW 78.08.090 3 does not require anything more to relocate a mining claim than compliance with RCW 78.08.060, 4 the statute relating to location…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Washington Water Power Co. v. Graybar Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. LundquistWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Appel v. AppelWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Wingert v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API