Legal Opinion

Appel v. Appel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2005No. 75262-1PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 We return to grandparent visitation, addressed previously in both the United States Supreme Court, Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 120 S. Ct. 2054, 147 L. Ed. 2d 49 (2000), and in this court, In re Custody of Smith, 137 Wn.2d 1, 969 P.2d 21 (1998), aff’d on narrower grounds by Troxel, 530 U.S. 57. But here we examine a different grandparent visitation statute, RCW 26.09.240. Applying Troxel and Smith we hold this statute is unconstitutional, reverse the Court of Appeals, and reinstate the trial court’s decision.

Sanders, J.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 “C” was born December 25, 1992, to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Parentage of CAMAWashington Supreme Court · 2005

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API