Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ballantyne v. Leeman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1948No. 32441PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is a mandamus action. The relators were among the signers of a referendum petition seeking to enforce, the Omaha city council- to suspend or repeal a certain ordinance, or submit it to the voters of the city. The trial court issued a peremptory writ of mandamus. Motion for a new trial being overruled, respondents appealed.

The facts necessary to an understanding of the issue will be set out, and then the legal questions discussed.

At a special election on July 18, 1922, the city of Omaha established the Omaha home rule charter by adopting chapter 116, Laws 1921. Such charter is also *849found…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Nelson v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Kleiber v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kelley v. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. City of Bowie v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Wennerstrom v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Noble v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Ballantyne Company v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API