Hunt Battery Mfg. Co. v. Stovall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action to recover damages for fraud in connection with the purchase of an automobile. Verdict and judgment were rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $325 actual damage and $100 punitive damage. Defendant appeals making six assignments of error, which are briefed and presented under two propositions.
The first contention is that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law. It is argued that plaintiff failed to prove that she was injured by the fraudulent representation. Gases are cited to support the rule that such proof is necessary to establish a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Freed Furniture Co. v. Criterion Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Carter v. Bond & BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Long v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- International Printing Ink Corp. v. Leader PressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bowles v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Garrett v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Keahey v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Buckholts v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.