Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Myers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 27, 1942No. 30194PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Nadine Myers and Herbert Myers, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, instituted this action against Otis Garrett, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover damages, actual and exemplary, which they alleged they had sustained as the result of fraud practiced by the defendant, who had induced them to enter into a contract with the corporation of which the defendant was president. The defendant denied all personal responsibility for the transaction; admitted he had induced the plaintiffs to enter into the contract involved, but averred that in so doing he was merely acting as an agent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rogers v. BrummettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Belcher v. SpohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Aaronson v. PeytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. First National Bank v. StriblingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  5. Hunt Battery Mfg. Co. v. StovallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moyer v. CordellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Sammie A. Riggs v. British Commonwealth Corporation, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Barnes v. McKinneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API