Legal Opinion

Harris v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 16, 1931No. 19992PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an action brought by Lena Smith against James M. Harris and Vera Harris to recover damages for falsely representing James M. Harris to he a licensed physician enabled to cure any and all human diseases, and falsely representing to plaintiff that she was suffering from a cancer and inducing her to purchase and use a certain remedy called “oil of radium,” which was by them claimed to be a “specific” for such disease.

Defendants first filed motions to strike certain • allegations from the petition, and also demurrer to the petition. These were overruled, and defendants answered by general…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Traer v. ClewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Diffie H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Carpenter H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McInnisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. American National Bank of Enid v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. McNeal v. SteinbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Baumgart v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Davis v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API