Legal Opinion
Softchoice, Inc. v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 7, 2009No. A08-0763, A08-0965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
Alleging violations of a non-competition and a non-solicitation agreement, Soft- choice, Inc. (Softchoice) sought temporary injunctions against two former employees, Martin Schmidt and Michael Johnson. The district court granted a temporary injunction against Johnson but not Schmidt. In these consolidated appeals, Softchoice (A08-0763) challenges the district court’s refusal to issue a temporary injunction against Schmidt, and Johnson (A08-0965) challenges the district court’s decision to issue a temporary injunction against him. Because the district court did not abuse…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Healthcare Services of the Ozarks, Inc. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Davies & Davies Agency, Inc. v. DaviesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Residential Funding Co. v. Terrace Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Softchoice Corp. v. MacKenzieDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2009
- U.S. Bank National Association v. Hao LiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026