Legal Opinion
Boland v. Morrill
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 13, 1967No. 40174PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
The question presented on this appeal is whether a wife’s recovery of her past medical expenses, as an assignee of her husband, in her separate action for personal injuries caused by negligence bars a subsequent suit by her husband for his personal injuries and loss of services of his wife caused by the same negligence.
The question arises in this way. On December 15, 1961, plaintiff, Lee A. Boland, Mabel Boland, his wife, and Ida Boland, his mother, were involved in a collision with an automobile owned and driven by Charles Henry Morrill. Lee A. Boland was driving an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Holmes v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Jedwabny v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Follansbee v. BenzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Patusco v. Prince MacAroni, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Plain v. PlainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Janke v. JankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.