Legal Opinion

Patusco v. Prince MacAroni, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 20, 1967PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintraub, C. J.

This case arose out of a rear-end collision between moving vehicles in a 50-mile zone. Plaintiff husband, whose ear was struck in the rear by defendants’ truck, said he applied his brakes because traffic ahead slowed to about 30 miles per hour while defendants claimed plaintiff, after trying to enter another lane, returned suddenly to his original path and unnecessarily applied his brakes when another vehicle in that other lane sounded a warning horn. Plaintiff and his wife, a passenger, both claimed personal injuries. The jury found in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Self v. SelfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Clarke v. . Eighth Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Cassidy v. ConstantineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Ziegler v. United States Gypsum CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Tyminski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. T & E Industries, Inc. v. Safety Light Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API